By our Reporter
Monrovia, Liberia – The proposal to reappoint Kabineh Ja’neh to the Supreme Court Bench has ignited a fierce debate and resistance within Liberia. The push for his nomination by Rep. Musa Bility and the Nimba County Legislature Caucus has caused significant controversy. Bility and his group argue that there is a vacancy on the bench due to the passing of Justice Joseph Nagbe and believe Jeneh is qualified and is best suited for the role since he was allegedly “Illegally removed by the George Weah Government.”
However, critics of Ja’neh’s reappointment point to his past involvement with the rebel group LURD and his alleged role in the killing of innocent civilians during the rebel onslaught on Monrovia. They question the morality and legality of appointing someone with such a controversial background to the highest court in the land. The mention of the atrocities committed, such as the massacre at Newport High campus and the rockets thrown near the US Embassy, further intensifies the allegations against Jeneh. Undisputed Janeh was a senior official of LURD for which he benefitted.
Opponents further argue that appointing Ja’neh would be unconstitutional and inappropriate. They emphasize the importance of an impartial and qualified judiciary, free from individuals with questionable histories. They believe that allowing someone with a background of criminal and violent activities in a position of power sends the wrong message to the Liberian people and undermines the pursuit of justice for the victims of the conflict. They advocate for a government that upholds civilized values and promotes progress.
President Joseph Boakai is now facing pressure not to proceed with this controversial appointment. It is suggested that he carefully consider the sentiments of the Liberian people and the need for a credible and unbiased judiciary. The resistance against Jeneh’s reappointment is driven by a desire for accountability, justice, and a peaceful and democratic future for the country. We cannot continue to compensate Janeh and cohorts for killing Liberians. In fact, he should now be included for war and economic crimes prosecution.
In conclusion, the reappointment of Kabineh Ja’neh to the Supreme Court Bench has sparked a heated and divisive discourse in Liberia. The arguments against his reappointment stem from concerns about his past involvement with a rebel group and alleged crimes committed during the conflict. Opponents stress the necessity of an impartial and qualified judiciary, free from individuals with questionable backgrounds. The resistance against Jeneh’s reappointment reflects a commitment to justice, accountability, and progress for Liberia.
President Joseph Boakai already has so much on his hands, especially at a time when Liberians are demanding a war and economic crimes court. Ja’neh does not deserve any public appointment. He is among several Liberians who were recommended by the TRC to be debarred and stopped from holding public offices for 30 years.
